misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
misrepresentation case law Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by regulation." It is very well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is issue to your procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
limitation of liability for the extent of the cap provided because of the registered mortgage deed(Banking Law)
Deterrence: The concern of severe repercussions, together with capital punishment, is meant to prevent likely criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is crucial in reducing the event of intentional killings.
These past decisions are called "case law", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—may be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Reasonable grounds are offered about the record to connect the petitioner with the commission from the alleged offence. However punishment from the alleged offence does not slide in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. yet acquired Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising away from FIR No. 1250/2024 dated 10.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is while in the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of your petitioner falls inside the exception where bail cannot be granted even inside the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, guidance has become sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion of the same is hereby reproduced:
Where there are several members of the court deciding a case, there may be a person or more judgments presented (or reported). Only the reason for your decision with the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may very well be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning could be adopted within an argument.
Extra username and password are demanded for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
Please note, if you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly.
Case regulation, also known as precedent, forms the foundation on the Pakistani legal system. Understanding relevant judgments and rulings is critical for interpreting statutes and predicting legal results. Free access to these resources democratizes legal knowledge, empowering citizens and advertising transparency.
Regardless of its popularity, not many may perhaps be familiar with its intricacies. This article is an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well as incredibly minimal threshold that governs it.
A decrease court might not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it truly is unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or even the legislature will reform the rule in question. If your court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it could either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for the judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
During the United States, consumers are not necessary to hire an attorney to represent them in possibly civil or criminal matters. Laypeople navigating the legal system on their personal can remember one particular rule of thumb when it comes to referring to case regulation or precedent website in court documents: be as specific as feasible, leading the court, not only to your case, but for the section and paragraph containing the pertinent information.